| From: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-01-19 16:50:33 |
| Message-ID: | 41EE8FD9.7080309@zeut.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>So is it firm policy that changes that require a catversion update
>>cannot be made during the 8.1 cycle?
>>
>>
>
>Not yet --- I suggested it but didn't get any yeas or nays. I don't
>feel this is solely core's decision anyway ... what do the assembled
>hackers think?
>
My personal goal for 8.1 is to get autovacuum integrated into the
backend. The patch I submitted during the 8.0 dev cycle required a new
system table for autovacuum data. Anyway we could get around that
without bumping catversion? Perhaps the vacuum daemon could add the
table if it's not found?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-19 17:44:48 | Re: Addition to TODO |
| Previous Message | Yann Michel | 2005-01-19 16:44:00 | Caching of frequently used objects |