Re: ext3

From: David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ext3
Date: 2005-01-18 00:43:48
Message-ID: 41EC5BC4.6030409@zara.6.isreserved.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> I recommend you don't use ext3 for any database:
> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Jan/0641.html
>
> apparently its still buggy.

So what is the recommended fs under Linux? I don't need the best
speed/throughput, but I prefer not to use ext2 due to long fsck time. I
also tend to avoid reiser3, it has given us many griefs in the past. XFS?

Regards,
dave

In response to

  • Re: ext3 at 2005-01-17 21:00:05 from Tzahi Fadida

Responses

  • Re: ext3 at 2005-01-18 00:52:11 from Rich Shepard
  • Re: ext3 at 2005-01-18 00:54:45 from Joshua D. Drake
  • Re: ext3 at 2005-01-18 01:47:53 from Jeff Davis
  • Re: ext3 at 2005-01-18 06:56:05 from Tino Wildenhain

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2005-01-18 00:52:11 Re: ext3
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2005-01-18 00:19:37 Re: pgpool