From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Removing our datasource/pooling implementation. |
Date: | 2005-01-11 22:06:14 |
Message-ID: | 41E44DD6.2080809@opencloud.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Kris Jurka wrote:
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Oliver Jowett wrote:
>
>>I use our plain DataSource and ConnectionPoolDataSource implementations.
>>Please keep them; the CPDS, especially, has scope to do driver-specific
>>work (consider RESET CONNECTION on proxy connection close()) that can't
>>be done at a higher level easily.
>
> The real problems seem to be in our PooledConnection implemention which is
> what I really wanted to get rid of. Since that's needed for CPDS I've
> kept the pooling datasource implementation, but updated the documentation
> to more strongly recommend against using it.
What needs fixing in our PooledConnection implementation? I can take a
look at repairing whatever concerns you. I haven't noticed any problems
myself, but our app hardly exercises the whole class..
-O
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-01-11 22:53:30 | Re: Removing our datasource/pooling implementation. |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-01-11 21:05:37 | Re: Postgres JDBC driver (80b1.308) bug |