Re: MySQL 5 comparison

From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Subject: Re: MySQL 5 comparison
Date: 2005-01-07 09:59:58
Message-ID: 41DE5D9E.6010907@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Ned,
>
>
>>That reminds me of another, related question ... can anyone comment on the
>>relationship between MySQL 5 and MaxDB (formerly SAP DB)? The talk at one
>>point was that the end result of that alliance would be a total rewrite of
>>MySQL to incorporate concepts from MaxDB, and that the new product would
>>somehow be backward compatible with both predecessors.
>
>
> That was the idea, yes. Personally, I don't think it's possible; that's
> probably the reason why MySQL 5.0 is two years late. I think eventually
> MySQL AB will have to come to terms with the idea that they have two seperate
> products, MySQL and MaxDB, and the two can't be made compatible.
>

Absolutely. I personally still hope that adopting MAX DB is their
biggest fault.
Please take some time and look at the MAX DB sources - it is the most
ugly thing I have ever seen in my live.

Hans

--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/660/816 40 77
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Christophe Arnu 2005-01-07 10:08:43 Re: Solutions Linux 2005 Feb 1,2,3 Paris
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2005-01-07 09:57:34 Re: MySQL 5 comparison