Re: Moving/Using Postgres Binaries on multiple machines

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Francis Reed <freed(at)iel(dot)ie>
Cc: "'pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving/Using Postgres Binaries on multiple machines
Date: 2004-11-24 13:26:51
Message-ID: 41A48C1B.4070701@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Francis Reed wrote:
> If I want to create a postgres database on multiple machines, is the
> practice of tarring or zipping up binaries compiled on one machine and
> untarring them on another, and using the binaries (initdb etc) acceptable?.
> This removes the need for having a compiler and environment on the target
> machine, or is it necessary always to have such an environment on any
> machine you intend to use postgres on? Postgres seems to have enough
> environment options to allow this to work, overriding the original library
> locations and paths etc from the original machine on which postgres was
> compiled.
>
> Does anyone see a problem with this approach?

Possibly hundreds. You clearly can't move from Sun/SPARC to BSD/x86 to
Linux/PPC. What platform are you interested in and why isn't there a
package manager for it?

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2004-11-24 13:33:00 Re: Moving/Using Postgres Binaries on multiple machines
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-11-24 13:24:43 Re: Creating index on a view?