| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Latin vs non-Latin words in text search parsing |
| Date: | 2007-10-23 21:58:28 |
| Message-ID: | 4183.1193176708@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> asciiword
>>> word
>>> numword
> No huge preference, but I see benefit in what Gregory was saying re:
> asciiword, alphaword, alnumword. word itself is pretty general, while
> alphaword ties it much closer to its intended meaning. They've got
> pretty consistent lengths as well. Maybe it leans too Hungarian.
I stuck with the previous proposal, mainly because I was already pretty
well into making the edits by the time I saw your message. But I think
that with this definition "word" matches pretty well with everyone's
understanding of that, and the other two are supersets and subsets that
might have specific uses.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-23 22:09:00 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-23 21:50:39 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |