Re: embedded postgresql

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "D(dot) Richard Hipp" <drh(at)hwaci(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: embedded postgresql
Date: 2004-10-20 15:37:03
Message-ID: 4176861F.6000400@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

D. Richard Hipp wrote:

>Client/server database engines clearly have their place. But they
>are not always the best solution to every data storage problem.
>
>

Nobody has suggested otherwise AFAICS. What we have suggested is that a
client/server system is a bad place to start when looking for an
embedded storage system.

Personally, I tend to use Postgres for client/server and BDB for
embedded data management.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2004-10-20 15:39:02 Re: plans for bitmap indexes?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-10-20 15:23:43 Re: Possible make_oidjoins_check Security Issue