| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sergej Sergeev <sergej(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plperl features |
| Date: | 2004-10-11 19:22:00 |
| Message-ID: | 416ADD58.7050906@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>
>>Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>>>We expected this to a degree of course, but if we can get some of
>>>them in, it would be nice for the community
>>>who wants to use plPerl.
>>>
>>>
>>On the other hand, it wouldn't be that nice for the community that
>>respects a good freeze. As you know, there will always be one more
>>feature.
>>
>>Considering that we're already a long time into the beta phase, and
>>we're still working out portability issues especially in the various
>>plug-ins, we really ought to be strict about the freeze in that area if
>>we ever want to get finished.
>>
>>
>
>Agreed. This is the downside of being bundled with the server. Sorry.
>
>
>
Entirely expected (at least by me). I certainly respect a good freeze
(what a nice phrase).
However, there are outstanding patches from Abhijit Menon-Sen that are
genuine bug fixes that need to be queued, reviewed and applied.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-11 19:22:47 | Re: plperl features |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-11 19:11:04 | Re: plperl features |