From: | Aaron Craig <mercutio(at)pobox(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Postgres, Win2k and DBD::Pg |
Date: | 2004-09-26 21:08:14 |
Message-ID: | 41572FBE.6050209@pobox.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm trying to install DBD::Pg (Perl postgres interface module) on my
Win2k with a fresh 8.0-beta2-dev3 postgres installation.
when I do
perl Makefile.PL
I get
Configuring Pg
Remember to actually read the README file!
Path to pg_config?
to which I respond
"C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\8.0-beta2-dev3\bin\pg_config.exe"
(including quotes)
to which Makefile.PL responds:
Not an executable: '"C:\Program
Files\PostgreSQL\8.0-beta2-dev3\bin\pg_config.exe"'
variations on the theme (pg_config, just the path, etc.) get the same
result.
Has anyone successfully installed DBD::Pg with the Win2k port?
Any pointers?
Thanks
- --
A:normal { font: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica; font-size: 10pt; color:
#808080; text-decoration: none; } A:active { font: Verdana, Arial,
Helvetica; font-size: 10pt; color: #808080; text-decoration: none; }
A:visited { font: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica; font-size: 10pt; color:
#808080; text-decoration: none; } A:hover { font: Verdana, Arial,
Helvetica; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold; color: #484848;
text-decoration: underline; }
Aaron Craig
mercutio(at)pobox(dot)com <mailto:mercutio(at)pobox(dot)com>
- -=-=-
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in
a naughty world!
- -=-=-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBVy++oyEQRcU83p4RAoEGAJ92pY64CUDBHn/ika496DeGH6IxQwCeNTKc
PPO9p+st41xu/Ysax/zJ2Z0=
=/KR8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-09-27 12:17:00 | Re: automated builds? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-09-26 13:21:19 | Re: automated builds? |