Re: pg_locks view and user locks

From: Paul Tillotson <pntil(at)shentel(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_locks view and user locks
Date: 2004-09-14 00:06:08
Message-ID: 414635F0.5080704@shentel.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This is the first I have ever heard "user locks," but I have more than
once wanted a lock that would persist beyond the end of a transaction.
Do these do that?

Paul

>"Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>... is there any merit to promoting the user lock wrappers out of contrib
>>
>>
>
>Dunno. Yours is the first message I can recall in quite a long time
>indicating that anyone was using userlocks. I thought the code was kind
>of dying on the vine. Of course it's hard to tell whether that's not
>just *because* it's in contrib and not mainstream. But personally I'd
>like to see some more evidence of use before we promote it. (And yeah,
>the API could probably use some cleanup first.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-09-14 00:17:34 Re: pg_locks view and user locks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-09-13 22:55:38 Cleaning up recovery from subtransaction start failure