Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types
Date: 1998-11-02 15:19:36
Message-ID: 4143.910019976@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> Huh. You have a backend crash fix, and we can't apply it until after
>> 6.4 is out the door?

> D'Arcy is going to release a patch for the fix on the same day as
> the release, as it is something that only affects a very small aspect of
> the server, and will affect very few ppl...

Of course, the other side of that argument is that D'Arcy's fix is a
very low-risk affair for the people who won't be using the inet types.
For the people who will be using them, it seems rather critical.

I think shipping the release without this fix is a mistake.

It sounds like D'Arcy could use a little advice/help from someone who
knows about proper handling of null inputs to functions and operators
(not me...). But if someone like that will step up to the plate, I
don't see why we can't squeeze in a solid fix.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-02 15:27:14 Re: [HACKERS] v6.4-BETA3 problems with FreeBSD
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1998-11-02 15:00:41 Re: [HACKERS] A small problem with the new inet and cidr types