Re: BUG #1244: Postgres doesn't work on FAT

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #1244: Postgres doesn't work on FAT
Date: 2004-09-07 17:00:16
Message-ID: 413DE920.5060304@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Harald Armin Massa wrote:

> Hello,
>
> in the release notes there is a "FAT is not really supported" notice
> for PostgreSQL.
>
> I suggest following workaround:
>
> create a cacls.exe and put it first in the search path. That cacls.exe
> should just return "OK" no matter of the imput-params.
>
>
> Be warned that "FAT is not really supported" has good reasons.

I think that we have to decide if postgres is supposed to work on
FAT32 or not. If, as I expect, the response is not, then we have to find
a relaiable way to detect a NTFS ( also when a tablespace is created BTW )
and refuse to start on a FATXX, and not trust on the failre of a cacls.exe

My 2 cents.

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafael Martinez Guerrero 2004-09-07 17:27:27 PosgreSQL is crashing with a signal 11 - Bug?
Previous Message Nobody 2004-09-07 16:10:24 Re: BUG #1242: Major bug in pgSQL