From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sixth Draft (BSD language) |
Date: | 2004-09-02 20:44:00 |
Message-ID: | 41378610.7020602@Yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 9/2/2004 1:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Ned Lilly wrote:
>> The original language I suggested was:
>>
>> PostgreSQL is released under a "BSD-style" license, which allows
>> maximum flexibility for corporate and individual users, with no
>> license fees regardless of how the software is used.
>
> My response still holds:
>
>>>>This is an incorrect interpretation of the licensing situation.
>>>>There are plenty of licenses that are granted free of charge but
>>>>still leave the recipient without any flexibility. The advantage
>>>> of the BSD license is the lack of restrictions on modication and
>>>> distribution.
>
>> I think that offers a good contrast to both MySQL and the commercial
>> competitors.
>
> You can *use* MySQL however you want, if you have obtained a legal copy.
> You just can't modify or distribute it however you want. That is an
> important distinction. Copyright law does not regulate use at all; it
> regulates copying. Once you have obtained a legal copy, you can use
> the software in any way you choose, even if some licenses try to give a
> different impression.
>
Add another CPU board to your server and ... oops ... once you *had* a
legal copy of Oracle.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-09-02 20:47:28 | Re: Sixth Draft (BSD language) |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-02 20:09:17 | Re: Sixth Draft |