| From: | Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Khee Chin <kheechin(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Ricardo Bessa <ricardobessa(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Show method of index |
| Date: | 2009-05-11 23:24:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4136ffa0905111624n3a45b8b7h91b7f4ef06700302@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Index "public.fooi"
> Column | Type | Definition
> -----------------+---------+------------
> f1 | integer | f1
> pg_expression_2 | integer | (f2+f3)
Is there any reason to expose "pg_expression_2" to the user at all?
It's not like they can make use of it in any public interface. I would
think we could just put the expression directly in the "Column"
column.
--
greg
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-11 23:25:44 | Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-11 23:20:12 | Re: Show method of index |