Re: Translation conventions

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Translation conventions
Date: 2009-04-09 13:04:32
Message-ID: 4136ffa0904090604i28263d82x783b9d53ea2ea07c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> It gets updated when someone with the language skills and interest updates it.
> :-/  As the header tells you, this wasn't recently:
>
> "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-09-22 23:33+0200\n"
> "PO-Revision-Date: 2003-09-22 23:05+0100\n"
>
> I guess you have some broader concern of which this is a special case?

Hm, I may have made an assumption here which might be wrong. I assumed
the original English strings were updated regularly whenever we made a
release or even more often. Even if no translator was available to add
translations for them. Or do we only regenerate the original English
strings on demand when someone is ready to translate them?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2009-04-09 13:19:47 Re: contrib/intarray vs empty arrays
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2009-04-09 12:59:43 Strange query plan with redundant aggregate nodes