Re: polyphase merge?

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Don Marvick <donmarvick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: polyphase merge?
Date: 2009-02-04 10:55:55
Message-ID: 4136ffa0902040255p335e49f7r423927298ba777e5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Is this basically the same as our current algorithm but without
multiplexing the tapes onto single files? I have been wondering
whether we multiplex the tapes any better than filesystems can lay out
separate files actually.

Or is there something else that's different here?

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-04 11:35:19 Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-02-04 10:09:57 Re: polyphase merge?