Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not sure why Peter didn't continue working on it.
> I'm still working on the postmaster/postgres merge. But the behavior of
> postmaster -o is not going to be removed. That TODO item might be
> appropriate in a release or three at best.
I think the point though is that -o becomes a no-op: whether you put -o
in front of some options won't matter anymore, because they'll be
interpreted the same either way.
regards, tom lane