Re: Postgresql feature

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>
To: John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>
Cc: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, Laimis K <laimis5423(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql feature
Date: 2004-08-19 07:27:59
Message-ID: 4124567F.4040702@frodo.hserus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

John Sidney-Woollett wrote:

> Bit more info (from my own findings migrating from Oracle -> Postgres)
>
> Sequences - YES
> Packages - NO (concept doesn't exist in PG)

You can create a schema to put all your functions/procedures in it and provide
access control to it.

I think it is good enough emulation of packages barring compiling them to detect
errors in pl/sql code.

This has been mentioned before and few people reported it to be good enough
workaround..

HTH

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Martini 2004-08-19 07:30:37 libpq: passwords WAS: scripting & psql issues
Previous Message Razvan 2004-08-19 07:23:29 Re: Postgres and JBOSS