Re: Thousands of parallel connections

From: Chris Travers <chris(at)metatrontech(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thousands of parallel connections
Date: 2004-08-17 00:24:19
Message-ID: 41215033.2050909@metatrontech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

>Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>I did last week an Ariadne+Postgresql valutation for the company where I work
>>and I learned that
>>with 250 MB you can open up to 80 concurrent query
>>with 500 MB you can open up to 120 concurrent query
>>from now on for each 250MB you can have ~40 connections more
>>
>>
>
>That does not add up: the graph can't have a negative y-intercept.
>There should be a substantial cost to run the postmaster at all,
>and then an essentially fixed cost per connection --- assuming
>that all the connections are running similar queries, of course.
>You're telling us the first 40 connections require zero RAM.
>
>
>
That is strange. Is it really linear or does the cost go up somewhat
after the first few?

> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>
>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
chris.vcf text/x-vcard 127 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Glen Parker 2004-08-17 00:30:00 pg_clog and pg_xlog empty, postgresql refuses to start
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-17 00:07:00 Re: pg_dumpall outputs incorrect sql