Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Import from Linux to
Date: 2004-08-14 13:26:28
Message-ID: 411E1304.4050704@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>
>> If you're sure the code in that routine hasn't changed since 7.4, then I
>> can just apply the patch to that branch.
>>
>
> It has - the prompt changes in version 1.37. But I don't think that
> conflict with this patch. I'll have a look this morning.

As expected:

Hunk #1 succeeded at 496 (offset -167 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 689 (offset -7 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 579 (offset -167 lines).

Here's the diff with 7.4 line numbers - tests fine for me.

cheers

andrew

Attachment Content-Type Size
copy-patch.74 text/plain 2.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-08-14 13:32:14 Re: PITR on Windows?
Previous Message Harald Fuchs 2004-08-14 13:21:22 Re: Calling PL functions with named parameters

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-14 16:19:32 Re: to_timestamp overloaded to convert from Unix epoch
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2004-08-14 13:22:52 Re: to_timestamp overloaded to convert from Unix epoch