>>Does anyone object to extending the grammar to allow this?
> Yes. This is horribly ugly, and I suspect that you cannot do it
> without making TABLESPACE a fully-reserved word.
This suggests a slightly different oracle syntax. I guess the word
'index' is optional.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2004-07-22 07:43:18|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery|
|Previous:||From: Christopher Kings-Lynne||Date: 2004-07-22 07:32:24|
|Subject: Re: Fixing PKs and Uniques in tablespaces|