>>Does anyone object to extending the grammar to allow this?
>
> Yes. This is horribly ugly, and I suspect that you cannot do it
> without making TABLESPACE a fully-reserved word.
I note that this seems to be the Oracle syntax:
CONSTRAINT PK_Stock PRIMARY KEY (Company) USING INDEX TABLESPACE
Appl_Indexes
http://www.siue.edu/~dbock/cmis564/otext4.htm
Since we stole tablespaces from Oracle, maybe we should make them work
the same?
Chris