Re: Assisting developers

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Assisting developers
Date: 2004-07-14 04:11:05
Message-ID: 40F4B259.2020703@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>Well, I note (and I'm not being unkind or anything here) that a lot of
>>the high level committers we have haven't been so active this release.
>>Peter and Joe haven't been around much and Jan has been busy with Slony.

I think this is (in part at least) a reflection of the economy finally
picking up. Last year this time I had one major project going on --
right now I'm juggling about a half dozen or so, any one of which could
keep me busy full time. Add a couple of OSCON presentations to prepare,
and several serial disasters/distractions at home (nothing life
threatening, but all time consuming), and that leaves little-to-no time
for recreational Postgres coding :(

> The committing isn't really the issue. It is reviewing and giving
> feedback to developers of complex features.
>

This is very true. But the fact that I have been able to commit what
little I have done this release has at least off-loaded some work from
you Bruce, hasn't it? I'm still green enough though that I'm not in a
position to review anything too complex -- someone like Tom or Bruce
would still need to follow up behind me, so it wouldn't really save them
any time.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-14 04:41:15 Re: Assisting developers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-07-14 04:08:12 Re: [HACKERS] Is "trust" really a good default?