From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security |
Date: | 2004-07-05 17:55:02 |
Message-ID: | 40E995F6.6030309@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Currently we have this in plperl.c:
> "require Safe;"
>
> I am thinking of submitting a patch to replace this with "use Safe
> 2.09;" to enforce use of a version without the known vulnerability.
>
> Any objections?
I have none, except will 2.09 work with 5.00503?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plperlng-devel mailing list
> Plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/plperlng-devel
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 640 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-07-05 18:12:50 | Re: [Plperlng-devel] plperl security |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-07-05 17:49:49 | plperl security |