Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-23 01:23:50
Message-ID: 40887026.8070708@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>Right, but you don't count ... you aren't an end-user
>
> True, but what the end users get is nothing because I don't have the
> time. No configure, no build environment, very user-unfriendly.
>

Exactly.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-23 02:24:18 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2004-04-23 01:00:22 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions