Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore
Date: 2004-04-20 20:46:32
Message-ID: 40858C28.4090906@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> g a data store for many databases, not a single database. But I think
> it is far too sanctified by history to change now, just as Ken
> Thompson now wishes he had put an 'e' on the end of 'creat' but can't
> go back and fix it. Maybe we should think about a symlink/hardlink to
> use a better name.

initcatalog?

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-04-20 20:54:25 Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore
Previous Message Chris Browne 2004-04-20 19:19:04 Re: pl/j looking for alpha testers