| From: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "Hot standby"? |
| Date: | 2009-08-12 12:17:05 |
| Message-ID: | 407d949e0908120517y2d8d99cfgb92b9f679463eb90@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:19 AM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:44 PM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> No! This is *not* what "hot standby" means, at least not in the Oracle world.
>
> I'm perplexed by this. For example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_standby
Well that just links to "Hot Spare" which is a term which existed long
before Oracle implemented hot standby or even warm standby for that
matter.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua Tolley | 2009-08-12 12:21:13 | Re: "Hot standby"? |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2009-08-12 09:20:00 | Error message for FK referencing deferrable unique/PK |