Re: Maintenance Policy?

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Maintenance Policy?
Date: 2009-07-13 01:39:07
Message-ID: 407d949e0907121839l34ce876cocbc69d245d329b46@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:07 AM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> This might open the larger question of:  What do we actually _promise_
> users?

The discussion had already covered that ground. If someone wants a
promise they'll have to fork over money to one of the companies which
sell such things.

That's why Josh's last email where he said just that we *didn't* plan
to support releases for longer than 5 years is much better than the
other attempts to say how long we *did* plan to support releases.

--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-07-13 01:44:06 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite rev.2163
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-07-13 01:07:40 Re: Maintenance Policy?