Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Date: 2004-03-22 05:19:40
Message-ID: 405E776C.5040105@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>Now, I have to change that relation_expr to qualified_name. However,
>>this causes shift/reduce errors. (Due to ALTER TABLE relation_expr SET
>>WITHOUT OIDS.)
>
> Well, seems like what you have to do is leave it as relation_expr
> as far as bison is concerned, but test in the C-code action and error
> out if "*" was specified. (Accepting ONLY seems alright to me.)

Actually, it occurs to me that the SET WITHOUT CLUSTER form CAN recurse.
Should I make it do that, even though the CLUSTER ON form cannot?

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-22 05:59:25 Re: [HACKERS] UnixWare/CVS Tip/initdb.c needs to use threads
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-22 04:00:46 Re: pg_autovacuum next steps