Re: Log rotation

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Log rotation
Date: 2004-03-12 18:27:40
Message-ID: 4052011C.6080804@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
>
>
>>Are you suggesting the that postgres project develop their own logger
>>rather than people just using one that has already been developed
>>by some other group?
>>
>>
>
>The problem from the point of view of Red Hat is to not introduce a
>dependency from the Postgres RPM to the Apache RPM ... this is no
>problem for people who don't mind hand-customizing their setup, but
>it is a problem if you want it to be part of the out-of-the-box setup.
>
>

Did anything ever come from this thread?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00603.php
(Heading: "Plan B for log rotation support: borrow Apache code")

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2004-03-12 18:30:32 Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-12 18:17:50 Re: Log rotation