From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
Date: | 2004-03-05 22:06:16 |
Message-ID: | 4048F9D8.7030603@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>* With -i and virtual_host: bind to specified address(es) only.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Can you bind one socket to more than one address?
>>
>>
>
>Nope. That's why we have provisions to listen on more than one socket.
>I think that was implemented for virtual_host, but it'd be necessary
>anyway for dual IPv4/IPv6 support.
>
>
>
I should have read the code instead of the docs, which only talk about
one address under virtual_host, not a space separated list of them:
virtual_host (string)
Specifies the host name or IP address on which the server is to
listen for connections from client applications. The default is to
listen on all configured addresses (including localhost).
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 23:08:55 | Re: IN joining |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 21:48:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 23:56:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 21:48:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 23:56:33 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-05 21:55:55 | Re: notice about costly ri checks (2) |