Re: Big 7.1 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Date: 2000-06-13 15:16:57
Message-ID: 4037.960909417@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>> do we have anyone who's committed to do the work? I heard a lot of
>> discussion but I didn't hear anyone taking responsibility for it...

> I offered to do the work and I have the md5 routine here and tested on
> a number of platforms. But as I said, I thought someone wanted to delay
> it until 7.2, if that's not the case then I'll get to it.

Far as I can see, you should go for it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Poole 2000-06-13 15:25:50 Re: trim() spec
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-13 15:03:39 Re: Big 7.1 open items

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Perchine 2000-06-13 15:19:17 Re: Small patch for memory leak in src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-06-13 15:06:01 Re: Small patch for memory leak in src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c