Re: Aggregation question

if you want to put 1000 columns into one table, your data structure
needs some further investigation. you are trying to solve the wrong problem.

Regards,

Hans

Dilip Angal wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a situation that I need flexible number columns to model the
> business requirements. It could go up to 1000 columns and will be a
> sparse matrix. One option I was considering was to have a table with
> col1......col1000
> Other option I can consider is store all of them as name values in
> single column as a string
>
> option 1
> col1 | col2 |col 3 |........|col56|.....|col77|
> 10 | 2 | | | 4 | | |
> 2 | | 4 | | |.... |6 |
>
> option 2
>
> "col1=10,col2=2,col56=4"
> "col1=2,col3=4,col77=6"
>
> I will have about 50Million such records in a table.
>
> I need to aggregate the column values for a given day by taking sum of
> all the rows
>
> "col1=12,col2=2,col3=4,col56=4,col77=6"
>
> Second option looks very elegant but aggregation is hard
> Besides, second option may have performance penalty (Especially when you
> have 50 Million records)
>
> Any one can give any pointers or comments on how to model this an how to
> aggregate it?
>
> Thanks
> Dilip
>
>

--
Cybertec Geschwinde u Schoenig
Schoengrabern 134, A-2020 Hollabrunn, Austria
Tel: +43/2952/30706 or +43/664/233 90 75
www.cybertec.at, www.postgresql.at, kernel.cybertec.at