Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Date: 2004-02-02 04:26:37
Message-ID: 401DD17D.2060605@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> With this approach, old GUC names would be recognized in SHOW and SET
> commands, as well as the other ways you can set a variable by name
> (postgresql.conf, ALTER USER SET, etc). But only the new names would
> appear in SHOW ALL or the pg_settings view. Does that seem OK?
>

Seems OK to me, in fact maybe preferred. But I wonder if we should emit
a NOTICE when old names are used with SHOW and SET commands?

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-02-02 04:53:30 Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-02 02:10:45 Re: fork/exec