From: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SCO Extortion |
Date: | 2004-01-21 02:16:46 |
Message-ID: | 400DE10E.6090701@ehpg.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks for the feedback thus far. I should also mention I use freebsd
for other stuff, but I am mainly asking in peoples experience, which is
the best for PostgreSQL to live on specifically. In terms of a nice smp
high end scsi system. Sorry for the lack of specifics on that before.
Gavin
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'm currently one of the targets of SCO's linux licensing extortion
>>business plan, and am contemplating switching to one of the BSD's to
>>avoid any potential problems. I'm curious which BSD people prefer for
>>large scale databases and why. Any pointers as to which I should test out?
>>
>>
>
>for the longest time, the BSDs have been split as:
>
>FreeBSD - i386 rock solid
>NetBSD - work on as many platforms as possible
>OpenBSD - be as secure as possible
>
>There is alot of code sharing between them all though, so, IMHO, alot of
>it is personal preferences ... I've been using FreeBSD since '95, and
>other then having a habit of finding (and, usually pushing) its limits,
>I've been most happy with it ...
>
>
>----
>Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Robert Norris | 2004-01-21 03:05:14 | Re: SCO Extortion |
Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2004-01-21 01:36:13 | Re: SCO Extortion |