On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> No, that's not an issue. We only wait for the backup-end record if we
> haven't seen yet since we started recovery from the base backup.
> Assuming the standby had reached that point already before the new
> backup from the standby started, backupStartLoc is zero in the control file.
OK. That assumption should be documented?
And, when we start an archive recovery from the backup from the standby,
we seem to reach a safe starting point before database has actually become
consistent. It's because backupStartLoc is zero. Isn't this an issue?
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Shinnick||Date: 2010-01-16 20:17:22|
|Subject: Misspelling in index - 8.4.2 manual downloads and on web|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-01-13 12:34:05|
|Subject: Re: Incrementally Updated Backups and restartpoints|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-01-13 22:20:40|
|Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-13 22:05:06|
|Subject: Re: patch to implement ECPG side tracing / tracking ...|