| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication status |
| Date: | 2010-01-09 06:53:48 |
| Message-ID: | 3f0b79eb1001082253x3a35d5dala105a63497f76f81@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> * Need to add comments somewhere to note that ReadRecord depends on the
>> fact that a WAL record is always send as whole, never split across two
>> messages.
>
> What happens in the case of the very large records Tom was describing
> recently. If the entire record doesn't fit in a WAL segment is it the
> whole record or the partial record with the continuation bit that
> needs to fit in a message?
It's the partial record with the continuation bit.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-01-09 07:25:31 | Re: Streaming replication status |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-01-09 06:49:13 | Re: Streaming replication status |