Re: write ahead logging in standby (streaming replication)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: write ahead logging in standby (streaming replication)
Date: 2009-11-13 05:29:30
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0911122129h55624e40y53417dd348d8f898@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Right, those are the possibilities, all four of them have valid use cases in
> the field and are worth implementing.  I don't like the label
> "semi-synchronous replication" myself, but it's a valuable feature to
> implement, and that is unfortunately the term other parts of the industry
> use for that approach.

BTW, MySQL and DRBD use the term "semi-synchronous":
http://forge.mysql.com/wiki/ReplicationFeatures/SemiSyncReplication
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/s-replication-protocols.html

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-11-13 05:34:07 Re: [PATCH] SE-PgSQL/lite (r2429)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-11-13 05:28:43 Re: next CommitFest