Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Date: 2009-04-21 11:48:51
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0904210448l36d9bb27u8b832540010a6f20@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> If you do this, then you would have to change the procedure written into
>> the 8.3 docs also. Docs aren't backpatchable.
>>
>> What you propose is *better* than raw pg_standby is now, but still not
>> enough in all cases, as I think you know.
>
> No, I don't. What is the case where it doesn't work?

It's the case which I described as the 2nd comment to your
proposal.

1. pg_standby tries to restore a non-existent file
1-1. remove the trigger file
1-2. pg_standby exits with non-zero code
2. the startup process tries to read it from pg_xlog
2-1. it is applied
3. the startup process tries to restore the next file using pg_standby
3-1. pg_standby gets *stuck* since the requested file and trigger file
don't exist.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kedar Potdar 2009-04-21 11:50:23 Automating Partitions in PostgreSQL - Query on syntax
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-04-21 11:38:18 Re: New trigger option of pg_standby