Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code

From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sync Rep: First Thoughts on Code
Date: 2008-12-24 18:36:45
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0812241036t2cf6d7e3q30f802fb2da771b8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I fixed some bugs.

On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Can we change to IMMEDIATE when it we need the checkpoint?

Perhaps yes, though current patch doesn't care about it.
I'm not sure if we really need the feature. Yes, as you say,
I'd like to also listen to everybody else.

>
> What is bkpCount for?

So far, name of a backup history file consists of only
checkpoint redo location. But, in this patch, since some
backups use the same checkpoint, a backup history file
could be overwritten unfortunately. So, I introduced
bkpCount as ID of backups which use the same checkpoint.

> I think we should discuss whatever that is for
> separately. It isn't used in any if test, AFAICS.

Yes, this patch is testbed. We need to discuss more.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

Attachment Content-Type Size
bkp_without_ckpt_v2.patch text/x-patch 17.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2008-12-24 18:41:17 Re: Hot standby and b-tree killed items
Previous Message David Lee Lambert 2008-12-24 18:08:01 Re: uuids on freebsd