Re: A question for the patch "blooming filter"

From: "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: ssmei_2000(at)yahoo(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A question for the patch "blooming filter"
Date: 2008-12-10 01:19:24
Message-ID: 3f0b79eb0812091719s4d9dcae4x660f6e03fc2f86b1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Unicron <ssmei_2000(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> i have a view of code, and find a question.There is a variable named
> 'bloom_pruning" set to be
> 'false' outside function 'bloom_filter_init' in file 'bloomfn.c', and there
> is a stataments
> if (bloom_pruning == false)
> return;
> at begin of the function "bloom_filter_init".
>
> And i don't find any places which set variable 'bloom_pruning' to 'true',
> may i take it as
> code following the statments above in 'bloom_filter_init' never execute?

bloom_pruning is GUC, so it's set to true/false when postgresql.conf
is parsed or SET command is executed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-12-10 02:53:15 Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202
Previous Message Unicron 2008-12-10 01:02:59 A question for the patch "blooming filter"