Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Brokenness in parsing of pg_hba.conf
Date: 2004-01-07 17:42:31
Message-ID: 3FFC4507.4010300@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:

>"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>
>>Second, you state that this usage is valid. When you first raised the
>>matter, you were so certain that it was sanctified by standard that you
>>asked me if I would implement it if you could quote an RFC sanctifying it
>>(I said yes) and went off to find one. To your surprise, you couldn't, and
>>now want to say that "valid" is defined for every OS in every context by
>>the man page for one library call on one OS (or possibly several).
>>
>>
>
>Would the POSIX/IEEE/SuS be authoritative enough?
>
>
>

Enough for me, yes, no matter how crazy I think it is ;-)

But as you seem to imply it still looks like Not Our Problem (tm).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-01-07 17:42:52 Re: Paypal WAS: PostgreSQL speakers needed for OSCON
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-01-07 17:30:02 Re: Bug in new buffer freelist code