Re: planner, how difficult to ...

From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Keith Bottner <kbottner(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: planner, how difficult to ...
Date: 2004-01-05 18:53:47
Message-ID: 3FF9B2BB.9020802@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>Keith Bottner wrote:
>
>
>>How integrated is the planner into the database? Put another way, how
>>hard would it be to separate the planner from the core database in
>>such a way that it could be easily replaced either during compilation
>>or even better with a runtime setting?
>>
>>
>
>The planner is configurable at run time in many ways. But maybe you
>want to start by explaining your problem instead of presuming a
>solution.
>
>

you can already "change" the planner.
just use GEQO instead of exhaustive searching,
why would you want to change the existing planner?
implementing a rule based planner like the one Oracle had is not a good
idea ;).

regards,

Hans

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2004-01-05 19:05:04 Re: Announce: Search PostgreSQL related resources
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-01-05 18:52:23 TODO list