Tom Lane wrote:
> This failure is actually entirely pointless, because (AFAIK) any page
> that is brought in during WAL recovery is going to be overwritten in
> toto from the WAL log. So it would be safe to run WAL recovery with
> zero_damaged_pages enabled. Rather than expecting DBAs to think of that
> under the stress of a crashed-database situation, I propose that we do
> it for them:
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Joe