Re: Win32 port

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: jm(at)poure(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 port
Date: 2003-11-19 10:29:31
Message-ID: 3FBB460B.7070709@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
> OK, now, some of us will complain that Win32 is not needed at a time when the
> Debian Synaptic graphical installer gives access to 13.748 packages. Win32
> sounds like an "old Atari game station". Agreed. On the long-run, everyone
> will leave Win32, even my grand-mother.

Well, jokes and rants aside, win32 port is on high priority.

The whole debate started on advocacy was 'Whether win32 port is killer-enough
feature?' and not 'Whether win32 port is required now?'

Win32 will happen. and we will revisit this debate when there is another release
with win32..:-)

Shridhar

In response to

  • Win32 port at 2003-11-19 09:42:43 from Jean-Michel POURE

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message strk 2003-11-19 10:44:16 PG7.4 ordering operator
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2003-11-19 09:42:43 Win32 port