Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 06:56:18
Message-ID: 3FB9C292.6050106@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


By the (non-existant) powers vested in me I hereby designate this as
"rehash old and fruitless arguments" week.

cheers

andrew

Dann Corbit wrote:

>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
>>Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:34 PM
>>To: Dann Corbit
>>Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Greg Stark;
>>PostgreSQL Development
>>Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
>>
>>
>>Dann Corbit writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>At the risk of stating the obvious: Cygwin is your friend
>>>>
>>>>
>>in exactly
>>
>>
>>>>this case.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Yes, but how friendly is it?
>>>
>>>
>>What are you asking here? Is it easy to install and use? Yes.
>>
>>
>
>You brought it up.
>
>
>
>>>Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
>>>
>>>
>>No, it does not.
>>
>>
>
>Really?
>
>What's this then?
>http://www.cygwin.com/licensing.html
>http://www.redhat.com/software/cygwin/
>
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2003-11-18 06:57:20 Re: Release cycle length
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-11-18 06:52:09 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?