| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release cycle length |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 02:32:56 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB984D8.5070509@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
> Right now, I believe we are looking at an April 1st beta, and a May 1st
> related ... those are, as always, *tentative* dates that will become more
> fine-tuned as those dates become nearer ...
>
> April 1st, or 4 mos from last release, tends to be what we aim for with
> all releases ... as everyone knows, we don't necessarily acheive it, but
Make it April 2nd, otherwise everyone will think it's a joke :P
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 02:33:25 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-11-18 02:26:09 | Re: Release cycle length |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 02:33:25 | Re: Release cycle length |
| Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-11-18 02:26:09 | Re: Release cycle length |