| From: | "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | jm(at)poure(dot)com |
| Cc: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
| Date: | 2003-11-17 18:44:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB916FC.90004@fmonkey.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Jean-Michel POURE wrote:
>Dear Devrim,
>
>Finally, I commented out the BuildRequires dependencies for wxGTK2ud in CVS.
>
>It appears that library names needed at build time are not the same under
>RedHat, Mandrake and SuSE. So, my 'stupid' recommended way is:
>
>rpmbuild --rebuild wxGTK2ud-2.5-xxxx.src.rpm 2>&1 | tee
>wxGTK2ud-2.5-xxxx.log
>
>
I realize it's a pain, but is it not possible to work the different sets
of BuildRequires into the spec file, using distribution-dependent
conditional statements?
>and read the log to make sure all needed libraries display 'sys'.
>
>Do not hesitate to send me by email the wxGTK2ud (with 'sys' libraries) and
>pgAdmin3 (S)RPMs and I will publish them in a new Fedora section. Do not
>hesitate to sign your email with OpenPGP.
>
>By the way, would you be interested in releasing daily snapshots for Fedora?
>We always need help...
>
>
Incidentally, why are we building snapshots specifically for FC1? Is
there a problem with the binary RPMs on Fedora? I have built the SRPMs
with no trouble.
ahp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-11-17 18:56:21 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |
| Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2003-11-16 14:49:25 | Re: wxGTK2ud BuildRequires dependencies |