Re: Comparing databases

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Jussi Mikkola <jussi(dot)mikkola(at)bonware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-12 03:44:26
Message-ID: 3FB1AC9A.3070405@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


> -- Durability: The PostgreSQL project is 16 years old, with years more
> experience than most comparable databases, commercial or OSS. PostgreSQL
> has already survived the death of several supporting companies and will
> be around for a long time to come.

"A name you can trust" (tm)

:)

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ned Lilly 2003-11-12 03:53:11 Re: Comparing databases
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-11 23:41:38 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL