| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM |
| Date: | 2003-11-11 00:16:12 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB02A4C.20608@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:54:25PM -0800, Joe Conway wrote:
>> two servers, mounted to the same data volume, and some kind of
>> coordination between the writer processes. Anyone know if this is
>> similar to how Oracle handles RAC?
>
> It is similar, yes, but there's some mighty powerful magic in that
> "some kind of co-ordination". What do you do when one of the
> particpants crashes, for instance?
What about "sympathetic crash"?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-11 00:48:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: psql force prompting on notty |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-10 23:43:48 | Re: Proposal: psql force prompting on notty |